일 | 월 | 화 | 수 | 목 | 금 | 토 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |
- qaether
- 가정
- SPIN
- 케이서
- 공간
- Bonding
- Axiom
- void
- Space
- Axioms
- manifesto
- 시간
- Gravity
- TIME
- 스핀
- 라그랑지안
- 공간결핍
- particle
- 게이지
- 대칭성
- 에테르
- 입자
- assumption
- 위상
- lagrangian
- Lorentz
- aether
- FCC
- 로렌츠
- symmetry
- Today
- Total
The Qaether Log
Dynamic equation --> Phase–path integral 본문
Can the dynamic equation be rewritten as a phase–path integral?
If every phase trajectory that starts at cell i and ends at cell j in Qaether theory is weighted by the energy associated with that trajectory, the usual lattice path-integral kernel
$$K\bigl[\phi_i\!\to\!\phi_j;\,T\bigr] \;=\; \!\! \int_{\phi(t_0)=\phi_i}^{\;\;\phi(t_0+T)=\phi_j}\! \mathcal D\phi\;\exp\!\Bigl\{\,i\,S_{\text{eff}}[\phi]\Bigr\}$$
is recovered. The derivation goes in three steps:
1. Identify the energy (Lagrangian) of a single time-slice
- For a small time step \(\Delta t\) write the finite–difference velocities $$\dot\phi_i \;\longrightarrow\; \frac{\phi_i^{n+1}-\phi_i^{n}}{\Delta t}$$
- The energy stored in that slice is $$E^{(n)} \;=\;\sum_i \frac{I_i(m_i)}{2}\Bigl(\dot\phi_i^{(n)}\Bigr)^2 \;+\; \sum_{\langle ij\rangle} \Bigl[ -K_{ij}\,\Im\chi_{ij} +U_0\,\Im(\chi_{ij}^6) +q_e\,A_{ij}\,\Im\chi_{ij} +g\,\vec C_i\!\cdot\!\vec A_{ij}\,\Im\chi_{ij} \Bigr] \;$$ $$+\; \sum_i P_i(m_i)\,V_s\,\ell_p\bigl(1-\cos\phi_i^{(n)}\bigr)$$ (Up to an irrelevant constant, the potential is the negative of the bracketed force terms.)
- Define the discrete Lagrangian $$L^{(n)} \;=\; -E^{(n)}$$
2. Build the discrete-time action
$$S_{\text{lat}} \;=\; \sum_{n}\! \mathcal L^{(n)}\,\Delta t \;\;=\; \sum_{n}\!\Bigl[ \sum_i \tfrac12 I_i(m_i) \bigl(\dot\phi_i^{(n)}\bigr)^2 - \sum_{\langle ij\rangle}V_{\langle ij\rangle}^{(n)} - \sum_i V_{{\rm Void},i}^{(n)} \Bigr]\Delta t$$
- \(V_{\langle ij\rangle}^{(n)}\) collects the four interaction terms and
$$V_{{\rm Void},i}^{(n)} = P_iV_s\ell_p(1-\cos\phi_i)$$
3 Take the continuum limit → path integral
- Let \(\Delta t\to0\) and \(a=\ell_p\to0\) while \(T=N\Delta t\) stays finite. One obtains the continuous action $$S_{\text{eff}}[\phi] \;=\;\int_{t_0}^{t_0+T}\!dt \biggl\{ \sum_i \frac{I_i(m_i)}{2}\,\dot\phi_i^2 \;-\; \sum_{\langle ij\rangle} \Bigl[ -K_{ij}\,\Im\chi_{ij} +U_0\,\Im(\chi_{ij}^6) +q_e\,A_{ij}\,\Im\chi_{ij} +g\,\vec C_i\!\cdot\!\vec A_{ij}\,\Im\chi_{ij} \Bigr] \;$$ $$-\; \sum_i P_i(m_i)V_s\ell_p \bigl(1-\cos\phi_i\bigr) \biggr\}$$
- Because the weight of every trajectory is $$\exp\!\bigl\{iS_{\text{eff}}[\phi]\bigr\}$$
- summing (integrating) over all trajectories between the fixed endpoints produces the desired path-integral kernel $$K(i\!\to\!j;T)\;=\; \int_{\phi(t_0)=\phi_i}^{\;\;\phi(t_0+T)=\phi_j} \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \mathcal D\phi\; e^{\,iS_{\text{eff}}[\phi]}$$
- The dynamic equation of Qaether is recovered by taking the stationary-phase (variational) condition \(\delta S_{\text{eff}}/\delta\phi_i = 0\)
- Hence the Qaether dynamics does admit a standard phase-path-integral formulation once one integrates over every discrete phase route from cell i to cell j.
- It tells that Qaether Theory is not just a set of discrete, cell-by-cell dynamical rules, but in fact admits exactly the same kind of path-integral quantization that underlies continuum quantum field theory:
- Global Sum over Histories
- Every way of “stepping” your phase field from cell i at time t₀ to cell j at time t₀+T contributes, weighted by
$$\exp\bigl(i\,S_{\rm eff}[\phi]\bigr)$$ - Nothing mystical is required—just as in standard QFT you sum over all field configurations, in Qaether you sum over all discrete phase trajectories.
- Every way of “stepping” your phase field from cell i at time t₀ to cell j at time t₀+T contributes, weighted by
- Stationary-Phase → Classical EOM
- Taking \(\delta S_{\rm eff}=0\) reproduces your lattice equations of motion exactly.
- This guarantees that the classical limit of the path integral is the very same phase-dynamics you wrote down.
- Quantization of Both Gauge and “Gravity” Sectors
- All of your interaction terms—phase-coupling \(K_{ij}\), quantization potential \(U_0\), \(U(1)\) and \(SU(3)\) gauge couplings, Void pressure—enter on equal footing in the action.
- You can therefore derive Feynman rules, compute loop corrections, and analyse quantum fluctuations of both the gauge fields and the emergent gravitational (Void/Regge) sector in one unified formalism.
- Consistency Checks & Renormalization
- If the continuum limit is well-defined, you can study whether those higher-derivative or non-linear pieces spoil unitarity or causality, or whether they flow to safe infrared fixed points.
- In principle, we can ask whether Qaether quantize to a renormalizable or asymptotically safe theory, or it require a UV completion (e.g. stringy, asymptotic safety scenarios)
- Connection to Standard QFT and Gravity
- By casting Qaether into a path integral, you can directly compare it to lattice gauge theory, Regge calculus, CDT, and continuum EFTs of gravity + YM.
- You can match couplings, identify ghost modes, test emergent Lorentz invariance at low energy, and see exactly how the discrete Void-phase picture dovetails with known quantum-gravity approaches.
- Global Sum over Histories
Results:
Qaether is fully quantizable. Its discrete phase dynamics can be reformulated as a conventional path integral with action \(S_{\rm eff}[\phi]\), ensuring that:
- Its classical lattice EOM emerge in the stationary-phase limit,
- Quantum fluctuations of both gauge and gravitational degrees of freedom are systematically computable,
- Standard tools (Feynman diagrams, renormalization group, unitarity checks) become available to test its consistency and make experimental predictions.
'Research Diary' 카테고리의 다른 글
시간에 따른 위상의 변화가 인과율을 보존하는지 여부 (v0.9) (0) | 2025.06.07 |
---|---|
격자 게이지 이론 유도 (v0.9) (0) | 2025.06.07 |
로렌츠 대칭성 복원 (v0.9) (2) | 2025.06.07 |
디렉방정식 유도 (v0.8) (2) | 2025.05.30 |
맥스웰방정식 유도 (v0.8) (0) | 2025.05.30 |